Updated: 3/12/2009 3:18:00 PM
Carroll´ s four-responsibility-frame was chosen as the basis of this research. The behavior of CSR in Chinese apparel enterprises was analyzed. The discretionary responsibility ranked last and was significantly lower than the three else. There is no significant difference between large enterprises and SMSE on the behavior of CSR. Only in the dimension of legal responsibility, enterprises possessing of foreign capital ranked higher significantly than domestic ones.
Authority in Charge: China National Textile and Apparel Council (CNTAC)
Sponsor :China Textile Information Center (CTIC)
ISSN 1003-3025 CN11-1714/TS